Datum
11. Juni – 13. Juni 2025
CfP to a panel at an STS-Conference in Stokholm
CfP to the panel „On Tinkering with Bodily Waste and Care”
7th Nordic STS Conference: STS in and out of the Laboratory
11–13 June 2025
Stockholm
Organizers:
Malissa Kay Shaw, University of Health Sciences & Pharmacy in St. Louis
Liwen Shih, Taipei Medical University
Submission link: https://www.nordicsts.se/call-for-abstracts/
Deadline: March 1st
Title max 150 characters and Abstract max 250 words.
Abstract:
“Why did care become an object of concern and what is it about care that warrants being studied and attended to in social science writing. This question cannot be answered by pointing to bare facts, but has to do with values.” (Mol et al. 2010:9)
“What is happening when we imagine otherwise worthless, even dangerous, human wastes as informative and valuable viral sentinels?” (Anderson 2024)
Waste is traditionally something unwanted, or useless, that should be discarded—intrinsically defined in relation to things perceived as valuable or productive. Theorizations of waste often draw on Douglas’ (1984) framing of “dirt as matter out of place,” a means to explore social categorizations of polluting, taboo, and dangerous substances. This is useful when considering bodily wastes (substances commonly imbued with disgust and repulsion), especially when outside the body where they are “out of place,” which negates their potential capacities to be reimagined as valuable/useful.
Similar to other forms of waste, bodily wastes pose symbolic and material consequences, particularly in the embodiment of their social disgust, and their containment or disposal. How we care for bodily waste—both symbolically and materially—affects present and future individuals, networks of human and nonhuman actors, the environment, and multispecies generational collectives. This panel proposes engaging with the notion of care to reimagine bodily waste and its alternative relational influences.
STS approaches, inspired by Celia Roberts, Annemarie Mol, and María Puig de la Bellacasa, frame care as collective, distributed practices that involve dynamic interactions between humans, nonhuman actors, and technologies. Care is neither static or tentative, but continual, sustained enactments that shape current and future worlds. By attending to the ways care is enacted through embodied, relational, and material processes, STS scholarship helps uncover the tensions, inequalities, and continual consequences embedded in care practices. Drawing on this, our panel aims to use care to mediate waste as an actor within various contexts and speculate on its value and lack thereof. Similar to waste, what is cared for and what is not, corresponds with what is valued and de-valued, and these values are passed onto and shape future humans and non-humans alike (Fredengren and Åsberg 2020:57).
We invite scholars to use care to speculate on the value of bodily waste in diverse contexts. This may entail asking: what is the relationality of bodily waste; how may new technoscientific, biosocial, or political economic practices transform what waste is and can do. Our own research in the realm of reproductive health offers examples. For instance, when constituting the uterine lining, menstrual substance is useful, contributing to embryo development. But when expelled from the body, menstrual fluid is “dirty,” requiring discreet hygiene practices in many cultures. Symbolisms of menstrual filth shape these practices and acceptable menstrual products, curtailing the suitability of reusable products and creating additional waste that impacts the environment and future interspecies generations. Menstrual “filth” symbolism limits technoscientific ventures to reframe menstrual fluid as a biosensor— transforming “waste” into a valuable, informative substance. Miscarried embryos and aborted fetuses, once expelled from the body, are often similarly categorized as medical waste within biomedical systems. Those entangled with this “waste,” however, mourn an unborn child, or recognize a biosignificant substance that imparts knowledge of reproductive potential. In such remakings, what was previously deemed “waste” can become critical tools for advancing scientific inquiries in diagnostic techniques, stem cell research, developmental biology, or genetic studies. This shift highlights the relational nature of value, where the enactment of waste and non-waste is contingent on the “waste’s” context, capacity, and framing. Continuing to tinker with bodily wastes, of which there are many, and notions of care may offer a way to re-value “waste” and transform its engagement with more-than-human worlds, both present and future.
References
Anderson, Warwick (2024) Excremental hauntings, or the waste of modern bodies. Society for Social Studies of Science. https://4sonline.org/news_manager.php?page=37981.
Douglas, Mary (1984) Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge.
Fredengren, Christina and Åsberg, Cecilia (2020) Checking in with deep time: intragenerational care in registers of feminist posthumanities, the case of Gärstadsverken. In Deterritorializing the future: Heritage in, of and after the Anthropocene, Rodney Harrison and Colin Sterling (eds). Open Humanities Press, pp 56–95.
Mol, Annemarie, Moser, Ingunn, and Pols, Jeannette, eds (2010) Care: putting practice in theory. In Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Transcript Publishing, pp 7‑25.
More information about the conference can be found here.
We look forward to receiving your submissions. If you have any questions or want to discuss paper ideas or presentation formats, please feel free to reach out to us!