Veranstaltungen

Veranstaltungskalender

An dieser Stelle präsentieren wir ausgewählte Veranstaltungen aus dem interdisziplinären Arbeitsfeld Ethnologie und Medizin.

Wir freuen uns über Veranstaltungshinweise an events@agem.de

Vergangene Veranstaltungen

2019

27. Mai - 28. Mai 2019

WORKSHOP - Bioethics and Human Temporality. Perspectives from the Beginning, Middle and End of Life

Andere

Date: 27-28.5.2019
Venue: Schlaues Haus Oldenburg

Organizers:

Prof. Dr. Mark Schweda
(University of Oldenburg, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Health Services Research)

Dr. Nitzan Rimon-Zarfaty
(University Medical Center Göttingen, Dept. of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine)

The role of temporality in bioethical debates has long been neglected: What does it mean for bioethical reasoning that life is lived, experienced, and understood as a process in time with fundamental temporal characteristics such as directedness, irreversibility, or finality? What does it mean that life is traditionally interpreted in terms of a particular temporal structure and extension, including a sequence of phases or stages connected to different social roles, norms and expectations? What does it mean that certain medical interventions and accompanying moral questions and conflicts focus on particular points in life?

The lack of reflection on the relevance of human temporality becomes particularly salient in ethical discussions at the beginning and end of life. Many bioethical discussions on the beginning of life rest on moral assumptions about the development of humanexistence over time. An example are the debates on prenatal diagnosis and abortion and the underlying models of phases of fetal development, or the bioethical discussions on informed consent and proxy decision making in the treatment of neonates.Bioethical debates on reproduction also exemplify the importance of temporality. For example, the common metaphor of the "biological clock" encompasses concerns about (reproductive) ageing and the finality of women's reproduction. Finally, medical interventions in the fields of geriatric medicine and biogerontology promote more ambitious standards of health, fitness, and functionality for later life and challenge common views of aging and the life course.

This international and interdisciplinary workshop is dedicated to the role and relevance of temporality for ethical reasoning in the field of biomedicine, healthcare, and the life sciences at the beginning, middle and end of life. It aims to develop a more concrete, empirically informed and culturally sensitive perspective on bioethics and human temporality. Talks by Claudia Bozzaro (Freiburg), Nolwenn Bühler (Lausanne/Neuchâtel), Limor Meoded Danon (Jerusalem), Jozef Dorscheidt (Groningen), Naomi Gershoni (Beer-Sheva), Solveig Lena Hansen (Göttingen), Julia Perry (Göttingen), Nitzan Rimon-Zarfaty (Göttingen), Ari Schick (Jerusalem), Mark Schweda (Oldenburg) & Karin Jongsma (Utrecht) (for program, see https://uol.de/medizinethik/workshop-bioethics-and-human-temporality/).

Due to limited space, registration is required by May 1st, 2019. Please register via email: nitzan.rimon-zarfaty@medizin.uni-goettingen.de

--
ד"ר ניצן רימון-צרפתי

Nitzan Rimon-Zarfaty, Ph.D
Phone: +49-1525-5800650
Marie Curie Post-Doctoral Fellow
Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine
University Medical Centre Gottingen
E-mail address: rimonn@post.bgu.ac.il
nitzan.rimon-zarfaty@medizin.uni-goettingen.de

Link zu dieser Veranstaltung

16. Mai - 17. Mai 2019

CONFERENCE - Familie, Beziehungen, Verwandtschaft und Kooperationen in medikalisierten Alltagen

Andere

18. Treffen des dgv-Netzwerks „Gesundheit und Kultur in der volkskundlichen Forschung“

Programm
Donnerstag, 16. bis Freitag, 17. Mai 2019 in Göttingen

Donnerstag 16.05.2019

13.00 Uhr Anreise/Begrüßungskaffee

13.30 Uhr Begrüßung: Sabine Wöhlke, Univ. Göttingen & Anna Palm, Univ. Mainz/ Stolberg

13.45 Uhr Den Wald vor Bäumen…? Der Stammbaum als relationierendes Artefakt in der medizinischen Beratung, Maren Heibges, Berlin

14.30 Uhr Auf der Suche nach der verbleibenden Zeit. Das Social Egg Freezing als soziomaterielles Verfahren zur Fruchtbarkeitserhaltung, Antonia Modelhart, Hamburg

15.15 Uhr Kaffeepause

15.45 Uhr „Das schaffen wir doch auch ohne die Bereitschaft!“ Vorgaben, Improvisationen und die Rolle von Beziehungen im geburtshilflichen Kontext, Marie Fröhlich, Göttingen

16.30 Uhr Impfkritische Mütter. Impfkritik im Kontext von gesundheitlichen Praxen und Care-Arbeit, Vanessa Tirzah Hautmann, Gießen

17.15 Uhr Rollstuhlfahrern zwischen Hilfsbedürftigkeit und Aktivität, Martin Wedeking

19.30 Uhr gemeinsames Abendessen

Freitag 17.05.2019

9.00 Uhr Zusammenkommen/Kaffee

9.15 Uhr Familie in der Medizin – Familienmedizin: das komplexe Zusammenspiel von Krankheit, Familie und Medizin im hausärztlichen Setting, Vera Kalitzkus, Düsseldorf

10.00 Uhr Freundschaft und Demenz – Potenziale von freundschaftlichen Sorgepraktiken für Menschen mit einer demenziellen Erkrankung, Nina Wolf, Zürich.

10.45 Uhr Kaffeepause

11.15 Uhr Intersubjektive Krankheitserfahrung und Caring: Analyse der sozialen Netzwerke von Lungenkrebspatient*innen, Anke Desch, Berlin

12.00 Uhr The performative effects of diagnosis: military masculinity, sexuality, and intimacy among Danish war veterans, Sebastian Mohr, Karlstad, Schweden

12.45 Uhr Lunch & Abschlussdiskussion; Ausblick nächstes Treffen 2021

Ca. 13.45 Uhr Ende der Arbeitstagung

Für die Verpflegung in den Pausen sowie für das gemeinsame Abendessen wird eine Tagungsgebühr von 30 Euro erhoben (diese wird vor Ort entrichtet).

Tagungsort:
Seminarraum, Institut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Humboldtallee 36, 37073 Göttingen

Anmeldungen und Rückfragen:
Sabine Wöhlke, E-Mail: sabine.woehlke@medizin.uni-goettingen.de; Tel. 0551-39-9673
oder Anna Palm, E-Mail: anna.palm@googlemail.de

Anmeldungen zur Teilnahme am Netzwerktreffens richten Sie an: info@netzwerk-gesundheit-kultur.de

Herzliche Grüße,
Anna Palm & Sabine Wöhlke
Sprecherinnen des dgv-Netzwerks Gesundheit und Kultur in der volkskundlichen Forschung

*****************************************************************************************************

Dr. phil. Sabine Wöhlke
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen / University Medical Center Göttingen
Institut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin / Dept. of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine
Humboldtallee 36
D-37073 Göttingen (Germany)
Tel. +49 (0)551-39 96 73
Fax +49 (0)55139 95 54
E-Mail: sabine.woehlke@medizin.uni-goettingen.de
http://www.egm.med.uni-goettingen.de
http://www.netzwerk-gesundheit-kultur.de

Link zu dieser Veranstaltung

2018

29. Jun - 01. Jul 2018

AGEM JAHRESTAGUNG 31 – Preparing for Patients. Learning the skills and values of healing encounters (DE)

AGEM-Veranstaltung

31st Annual Conference of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Ethnomedizin e.V. (AGEM) in Cooperation with the Collaborative Research Center Media of Cooperation at the University of Siegen

How physicians and other healers conduct their encounters with clients is an  integral element of becoming healers. Nevertheless, this knowledge is only partly provided by official channels or courses; rather, it is often learned in a subtle and implicit  manner  during  practical   apprenticeship.   Despite   broad   investigations of the professional encounters between healers and  their  clients,  few  studies  have  addressed  the  question  how  exactly  these  skills  and  attitudes are  learned. A main criticism of the patient-physician relationship in biomedical contexts has  long been its asymmetry (Pilnick und Dingwall 2011), and empirical studies have time and again reasserted fundamental disparities between those seeking and those providing health services (Begenau et al. 2010). At the same time, these asymmetries are constitutive of the healing encounter, because they form a functional difference between healer and client: without the attribution of special  knowledge and skills to the healing party, the whole encounter would be dispensable. In contrast to biomedical contexts, the encounter of non-biomedical healers with their clients is often conceived as being less hierarchical. Yet, we would assume a similar functional difference between them. We assume that how these asymmetries and differences are managed and performed in daily practice is largely learned in the formative years of apprenticeship.
Since the seminal studies “The Student Physician” (Merton et al. 1957) and “Boys in White” (Becker et al. 1961), there has been little in-depth research on how students of healing practices acquire such skills and how they are transmitted in learning contexts. These studies have shown how  novice  physicians  learn  to  cope  with  the contingencies of daily work and how they learn to balance responsibility and experience. Through fine-grained ethnographic fieldwork, the researchers were able to show how such skills and attitudes are learned in the processes of becoming a competent member, by observing and imitating role models and by being sensitive to the norms and values displayed by significant others. In line with Becker et al., we assume that most of these skills are part of the tacit learning in the “hidden curriculum” (Hafferty and Franks 1994). The hidden curriculum refers to those aspects of learning contexts that do not figure prominently in official accounts, but are learned as part of becoming a member of a healing profession. Despite (or because of) their informal character, they serve as powerful orientations that slowly become taken for granted, in many cases without explicit recognition by those who teach and learn them. In the course of the conference, we want to shed light on how apprentices of healing professions are preparing and are being prepared for their encounters with patients or clients. Irrespective of the given healing cosmology, all healing knowledge is ordered in specific systems, organized in rules, schemes, and procedures that need to be adapted to the individual healing encounter. Therefore, every healing encounter is laced with fundamental uncertainties – not only with respect to treatment but also to interaction (cf. Fox 1980; Henry 2006). And all healing apprentices learn how to cope with these contingencies. The subtle transmission of a “paternalistic” model of physician-patient interaction in biomedical education might account for the long-standing asymmetry that are part of the official program of medical education, despite longstanding calls for “shared decision making” and “informed consent” (Stollberg 2008) . Consequently, “professional dominance” (Freidson 1970) is a skill that needs to be learned before it can be practiced.
Thus, we want to compare and take a closer look at the subtle modes of how students of different healing  practices  –  biomedical  as  a  well  as  all  other  healing traditions – are prepared and how they prepare themselves for their encounters  with  patients.  We  want  to  ask  questions  along  the  following   lines:
•Which attitudes are transmitted for coping with the tension between standard procedures and individual  cases?
•Which roles do authority, performances of authority, competence, empathy, uncertainty, responsibility, and experience play?
•What modes of teaching and learning the “hidden curriculum” can be observed?
Conference Language: English

CME points for physicians and psychotherapists can be obtained.

Dokumente

Poster
Book of Abstracts
Call for Papers

Kontakt

Cornelius Schubert:cornelius.schubert@uni-siegen.de
Ehler Voss: ehler.voss@uni-siegen.de

Link zu dieser Veranstaltung

53 54 55 56 57 58