Ethical frameworks, health-seeking and care pathways in superdiverse environments.
Panel
Panel at ASA UK conference in Birmingham
CfP for a Panel on „Ethical frameworks, health-seeking and care pathways in superdiverse environments”
ASA UK conference in Birmingham
8–11th April 2025
Short Abstract:
This panel explores ethnographically how ethics shapes health-seeking behaviours and how health services may design care pathways that accommodate diverse moral worldviews. Ethical frameworks and lived experience ‑especially in situations of precarity- shape how people navigate health services.
Long Abstract
Ethical frameworks, health-seeking and care-pathways in superdiverse environments.
To provide adequate services, health providers and civil society organisations need for their care pathways to be adapted to the reality of health-seeking practices. In turn, in superdiverse environments, advice and health-seeking differs between social groups (according to gender, income, race and ethnicity, migration status and so on). In circumstances of extreme precarity – cost of living crisis, in-poverty employment, racism and discrimination, etc.- uncertainty and lived experience play a major role (MacGregor et al 2020).
People do not behave in a predicted linear fashion solely according to their socio-demographic characteristics, but rather experience precarious life and deal with emergent and unexpected challenges and priorities of an uncertain environment (Al-Mohammad and Peluso 2012). In turn people practice moral navigation, adapting and reassessing their values, priorities and health decisions as their therapeutic itinerary unfolds, rather than following fixed pathways (White and Jha 2021).
People’s ethical frameworks – how they behave as ethical agents, morally bound to others (their peers, their families, etc.)- shape how people seek health advice and their decisions when engaging with health providers and public services (Ripoll et al 2022).
This panel is seeking ethnographic papers that contribute to the following questions:
– How do people’s moral and ethical demands shape their health-seeking practices?
– Do people face moral conundrums when deciding to make particular decisions in health care or in and how do they
– What role does uncertainty and emergence play in this moral navigation of health services?
– How do health service providers take into account people’s moral lives when assessing people’s navigation of health services?
– Can care pathways be adapted to the different moral worldviews of the people they wish to support through the health system?
This panel will aim to bring together ethnographic insights from the field of anthropology of ethics with applied anthropology in the context of health.
References:
Al-Mohammad, H., & Peluso, D. (2012). Ethics and the “rough ground” of the everyday: the overlappings of life in postinvasion Iraq. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2(2), 42–58.
MacGregor, H., Ripoll, S., & Leach, M. (2020). Disease outbreaks: navigating uncertainties in preparedness and response. Taylor and Francis.
Ripoll, S., Ouvrier, A., Hrynick, T., & Schmidt-Sane, M. (2022). Vaccine Equity in Multicultural Urban Settings. A comparative analysis of local government and community action, contextualised political economies, and moral frameworks in Marseille and London
White, S. C., & Jha, S. (2021). Moral navigation and child fostering in Chiawa, Zambia. Africa, 91(2), 249–269.
Ethical frameworks, health-seeking and care-pathways in superdiverse environments
Panel
Panel at ASA UK conference in Birmingham
Ethical frameworks, health-seeking and care-pathways in superdiverse environments
Panel for the ASA UK conference in Birmingham
8–11th April 2025
We’re aiming to bring together ethnographic insights from the field of anthropology of ethics with applied anthropology in the context of health.
Short Abstract
This panel explores ethnographically how ethics shapes health-seeking behaviours and how health services may design care pathways that accommodate diverse moral worldviews. Ethical frameworks and lived experience ‑especially in situations of precarity- shape how people navigate health services.
Long Abstract
Ethical frameworks, health-seeking and care-pathways in superdiverse environments.
To provide adequate services, health providers and civil society organisations need for their care pathways to be adapted to the reality of health-seeking practices. In turn, in superdiverse environments, advice and health-seeking differs between social groups (according to gender, income, race and ethnicity, migration status and so on). In circumstances of extreme precarity – cost of living crisis, in-poverty employment, racism and discrimination, etc.- uncertainty and lived experience play a major role (MacGregor et al 2020).
People do not behave in a predicted linear fashion solely according to their socio-demographic characteristics, but rather experience precarious life and deal with emergent and unexpected challenges and priorities of an uncertain environment (Al-Mohammad and Peluso 2012). In turn people practice moral navigation, adapting and reassessing their values, priorities and health decisions as their therapeutic itinerary unfolds, rather than following fixed pathways (White and Jha 2021).
People’s ethical frameworks – how they behave as ethical agents, morally bound to others (their peers, their families, etc.)- shape how people seek health advice and their decisions when engaging with health providers and public services (Ripoll et al 2022).
This panel is seeking ethnographic papers that contribute to the following questions:
- How do people’s moral and ethical demands shape their health-seeking practices?
- Do people face moral conundrums when deciding to make particular decisions in health care or in and how do they
- What role does uncertainty and emergence play in this moral navigation of health services?
- How do health service providers take into account people’s moral lives when assessing people’s navigation of health services?
- Can care pathways be adapted to the different moral worldviews of the people they wish to support through the health system?
This panel will aim to bring together ethnographic insights from the field of anthropology of ethics with applied anthropology in the context of health.
To propose a paper, please do so through the ASA website. https://theasa.org/conferences/asa2025/programme#15931
References
Al-Mohammad, H., & Peluso, D. (2012). Ethics and the “rough ground” of the everyday: the overlappings of life in postinvasion Iraq. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2(2), 42–58.
MacGregor, H., Ripoll, S., & Leach, M. (2020). Disease outbreaks: navigating uncertainties in preparedness and response. Taylor and Francis.
Ripoll, S., Ouvrier, A., Hrynick, T., & Schmidt-Sane, M. (2022). Vaccine Equity in Multicultural Urban Settings. A comparative analysis of local government and community action, contextualised political economies, and moral frameworks in Marseille and London
White, S. C., & Jha, S. (2021). Moral navigation and child fostering in Chiawa, Zambia. Africa, 91(2), 249–269.
Ethical frameworks, health-seeking and care-pathways in superdiverse environments
Panel
Medanth panel at ASA UK
„Ethical frameworks, health-seeking and care-pathways in superdiverse environments”
8–11.04.2025
Birmingham, UK
More Info: https://theasa.org/conferences/asa2025/programme#15931
Social and biological reproduction: Entangled concepts on the move in medical research, practice, and policy
Panel
Panel at the upcoming ASA 2025 conference
„Social and biological reproduction: Entangled concepts on the move in medical research, practice, and policy”
Panel at the upcoming ASA 2025 conference taking place in
8–11 April
Birmingham
Social and biological reproduction: Entangled concepts on the move in medical research, practice, and policy will be a panel examining the entangling of social and biological reproduction in medical research, practice, and policy, broadly conceived (pun intended). We invite anthropological works which consider these relations today, especially via the social reproduction of kinship, parenthood, or technologies of relatedness. The long abstract with more information is provided below.
The deadline for abstracts is November 18th. Abstracts may be submitted by following this link.
Convenors:
Taylor Riley (University College London)
Olga Doletskaya (University College London)
Long abstract:
Biological and social reproduction are deeply entangled (Rapp and Ginsburg 1991) and reproduction is always a concept on the move. ‘Social reproduction’ has been taken up widely in feminist research as both the undervalued labour that sustains human life and the labour that reproduces social systems and relations. What reproduction and kinship are biologically is co-reproduced with their legal, economic, and cultural meanings. As assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) become, though unevenly, more ordinary (Franklin 2013), entwined concepts of social and biological reproduction continue to travel.
In their close attention to human experiences and relations, anthropological approaches, such as bioethnography (Roberts and Sanz 2017), are well-suited to trace these travels today. Population studies such as birth cohorts are invested in the business of biological reproduction alongside the social reproduction of participation that keeps studies alive. The proliferation of ARTs like in vitro gametogenesis will necessitate socially reproduced changes to concepts of relatedness. Reproductive justice is implicated in the above and other examples—how do these social reproductions deny or grant access to personhood or care, especially for those who are marginalized? Can kinship be post-genomic in these contexts, or only elsewhere?
We invite works using ethnographic methods to discuss biological and social reproduction with reference to biomedical discourses and/or institutions, health policies, population research, and/or the worlds of science and medicine, broadly defined. Papers could e.g. focus on:
- Studies of conception/birth, maternal/infant health, families, and/or parenting
- Genetic or epigenetic research and/or policies
- Reproductive health research and/or policies
- ARTs
- Medicalized fertility and/or infertility
Social and biological reproduction: Entangled concepts on the move in medical research, practice, and policy
Panel
CfP for a Panel at the upcoming ASA 2025 conference, Birmingham
Panel on „Social and biological reproduction: Entangled concepts on the move in medical research, practice, and policy”
ASA 2025 conference taking place in
8–11 April
Birmingham
Social and biological reproduction: Entangled concepts on the move in medical research, practice, and policy will be a panel examining the entangling of social and biological reproduction in medical research, practice, and policy, broadly conceived (pun intended). We invite anthropological works which consider these relations today, especially via the social reproduction of kinship, parenthood, or technologies of relatedness. The long abstract with more information is provided below.
The deadline for abstracts is November 18th. Abstracts may be submitted by following this link: https://nomadit.co.uk/conference/asa2025/panel/15950
Panel Title:
Social and biological reproduction: Entangled concepts on the move in medical research, practice, and policy
Convenors:
Taylor Riley (University College London)
Olga Doletskaya (University College London)
Long abstract:
Biological and social reproduction are deeply entangled (Rapp and Ginsburg 1991) and reproduction is always a concept on the move. ‘Social reproduction’ has been taken up widely in feminist research as both the undervalued labour that sustains human life and the labour that reproduces social systems and relations. What reproduction and kinship are biologically is co-reproduced with their legal, economic, and cultural meanings. As assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) become, though unevenly, more ordinary (Franklin 2013), entwined concepts of social and biological reproduction continue to travel.
In their close attention to human experiences and relations, anthropological approaches, such as bioethnography (Roberts and Sanz 2017), are well-suited to trace these travels today. Population studies such as birth cohorts are invested in the business of biological reproduction alongside the social reproduction of participation that keeps studies alive. The proliferation of ARTs like in vitro gametogenesis will necessitate socially reproduced changes to concepts of relatedness. Reproductive justice is implicated in the above and other examples—how do these social reproductions deny or grant access to personhood or care, especially for those who are marginalized? Can kinship be post-genomic in these contexts, or only elsewhere?
We invite works using ethnographic methods to discuss biological and social reproduction with reference to biomedical discourses and/or institutions, health policies, population research, and/or the worlds of science and medicine, broadly defined. Papers could e.g. focus on:
- Studies of conception/birth, maternal/infant health, families, and/or parenting
– Genetic or epigenetic research and/or policies
– Reproductive health research and/or policies
– ARTs
– Medicalized fertility and/or infertility
Climate change, island change, and wellbeing in small island communities
Panel
CfP for a panel in the international Conference Health, Environment, and AnThropology (HEAT)
Call for paper to the panel on the topic „Climate change, island change, and wellbeing in small island communities”
Health, Environment, and AnThropology (HEAT)
Durham
23 – 24 April 2025
co-organised by Durham and Edinburgh Universities and sponsored by the Royal Anthropological Society (RAI)
CALL FOR PAPERS
Panel: “Climate change, island change, and wellbeing in small island communities”
Surrounded by sea, islands have long been seen as remote and isolated by necessity, though island life in practice involves movement both out of and back towards the island (Kohn, 2006; Nic Craith, 2020). Without enough attention being paid to the needs of island communities in decision- and policy-making affecting them, islands are also frequently associated with vulnerability (Kotsira, 2021), among others raising concerns about their sustainability and resilience (Ratter, 2017). If island life is already challenging as such, what is the further impact of climate change and climate-induced disasters on the mental health and wellbeing of islanders, particularly in small island communities?
This panel invites papers discussing ethnographic examples and primary research covering aspects such as:
‑Local understandings of mental health and wellbeing, and whether/how they are impacted by the climate crisis and the ways islanders respond to changing circumstances.
Access to mental health services and service gaps to be addressed so small island populations facing the by-products of climate change are supported.
‑How preconceptions of remoteness and isolation, vulnerability, sustainability and resilience are challenged by the circumstances created by the climate crisis
locally, and their impact on mental health and wellbeing.
‑The role of climate change in conceptualisations of the future on/of small islands, feelings of uncertainty, and their impact on islanders’ mental health and
wellbeing.
‑How the mental health and wellbeing of researchers are affected while doing research on small islands impacted by the climate crisis, including coping mechanisms and
research strategies.
ABSTRACT SUBMISSION GUIDANCE
The deadline for submissions is 13 January 2025.
Please submit your paper abstract through the conference portal here: https://pay.durham.ac.uk/event-durham/abstract/info
Once you access the portal:
Choose from the drop-down menu the event you wish to attend: Health, Environment, and AnThropology (HEAT) 2025.
Fill in your personal and professional details.
Provide the title of the paper you wish to present.
Select talk from the list of presentation options.
Upload your paper abstract. Your abstract must me no more than 250 words, and attached as a .doc or .pdf file (maximum upload size 10 MB).
Select from the drop-down menu the title of the panel you wish to join: Climate change, island change, and wellbeing in small island communities.
You do not have to be an RAI or ASA member to propose a paper, but please note that only papers submitted via conference portal will be considered.
More information about the conference can be found on the website: https://pay.durham.ac.uk/event-durham/health-environment-and-anthropology-heat-2024
Influence of Changing Ecologies on Health and Human Adaptation at Local, National and Global level
Panel
CfP for Panel at HEAT 2025, Durham University, UK
Panel on “Influence of Changing Ecologies on Health and Human Adaptation at Local, National and Global level”
HEAT 2025
Durham University (UK)
April 23–24, 2025
Deadline 13 January 2025
Panel Abstract:
In Anthropology, research on interactions and the complex network of humans, health and environment started early with the cultural ecology theory and medical anthropology in the 1930s and 1960s respectively. The focus theme of these approaches had been adaptation including factors of genetics, physiology, culture and the approaches assumed that health is determined by environmental adaptation and that diseases arise from environmental imbalances. Further studies are required to understand the consumption patterns which are associated with health risks affecting human biology, ecology and the epidemiology of emerging and reemerging diseases. As researchers, the pressing question is the present scenario of regional, national and global affairs such as climate change, food insecurity, environmental health, demographic shifts, etc. Though there are ongoing consistent efforts to identify strategies and bring out solutions, yet, it requires extensive studies on ecological changes and the associated health disparities. With this backdrop, the panel invites papers/studies conducted within (but not limited to) South Asia to explore the cross-cultural impact of ecological changes on populations. It seeks to highlight health disparities arising from these changes and have an in-depth discussion on regional-specific health implications, as well as include trends in research methodology. The panel, in conclusion, will be addressing the ‘Ecology-Human Adaptation Imbalance’ and will try to identify the loopholes and bring out probable alternatives for region-specific populations.
The panel will explore the extent to which changing environmental conditions bring about adverse health consequences and adaptive imbalance under various ecological conditions. The panel invites papers on the theme of ‘Ecology-Human Adaptation Imbalance’ in the context of the following areas-
Traditional and marginalised communities.
Urban ecology.
Food environment.
Demography and access to Public Health.
Ageing and Environment Interaction
Adaptation to ecological vulnerabilities.
You can submit your abstracts in the Abstract Management Portal on or before 13 January 2025. The abstract should not be more than 250 words and the above link provides further information on the process of abstract submission. All papers must be submitted via the submission point on the conference website (below). This should be uploaded in .doc or .pdf format. Proposals must consist of:
Title of the panel you wish join;
The title of the paper you wish to present;
An abstract of no more than 250 words.
Paper proposals will be reviewed by panel convenor(s) and a decision on whether the paper has been accepted or rejected will come from them.
Only papers submitted via the link below will be considered by panel convenors.
Website Link- Event Durham – Abstract Management
Rules
You do not have to be an RAI or ASA member to propose a paper.
You may only present once at the conference. Panel chairs and discussants may also present a paper on a different panel.
All those attending the conference, including discussants and chairs, will need to register and pay to attend.
For any query, kindly contact: karvileena@gauhati.ac.in
Scaling toxic exposure; intergenerational responsibility, care and planetary health
Panel
CfP for a panel at Environment, and Anthropology (HEAT) Conference, Durham, UK
Call for abstracts to a panel on „Scaling toxic exposure; intergenerational responsibility, care and planetary health”
Health, Environment, and Anthropology (HEAT) Conference
Durham University (UK)
April 23–24, 2025
The call is scheduled to close on 13 January
If you are interested, please submit an abstract via the Abstract Management portal. The website includes guidance on how papers should be submitted and a drop down list of panels a proposer can select from.
Details: Scaling toxic exposure; intergenerational responsibility, care and planetary health
Chemical exposure and their potential toxic arrangements are intergenerational, crossing lines of kinship and connecting relations to molecules, multiple bodies, ecologies and social spaces through non-linear temporalities. This presents significant challenges for ethnographic research confronting scales of exposure in the context of planetary health, escalating climate and ecological crises, profound inequality, and ongoing colonial formations. In military campaigns devastating lives, genocide brings ecocide. There is a need to examine the novel configurations of intergenerational responsibility, justice and care which arise at these junctures, as they index possibilities for other ways of life. This requires creative orientations to method, concepts and theory to address the complex temporal and spatial scales of toxic exposure.
Our panel seeks contributions from those engaging with chemical exposures and questions of intergenerational time and social relations within anthropology and/or in dialogue with other disciplines and those addressing the methodological challenges and conceptual approaches related to these themes.
Our panel is guided but not limited to the following questions:
-How can intergenerational chemical exposure be examined given that temporality of toxicity is not linear?
‑What are the possibilities for action – for ourselves as researchers, for our research communities, and for wider groups entangled in these landscapes – if conventional mechanisms of causality do not apply?
‑If the materiality and latency of chemical exposure articulates an absence in the present how can we examine the pervasive and elusiveness of toxicity?
‑What kinds of ethnographic (re)orientations are required to critically orient to the multiple temporalities of chemical toxicity? What can the work of comparison facilitate in examining scales of toxic exposure?
Where Are We Now? Visual and Multimodal Anthropology
Panel
Call for Panels: RAI FILM Online Conference 2025
Call for Panels: RAI FILM Online Conference 2025: „Where Are We Now? Visual and Multimodal Anthropology”
28 April – 2 May 2025 (Online only)
RAI FILM and the Film Committee of the Royal Anthropological Institute invites panel, roundtable, and workshop proposals on any facet of visual, multisensory and multimodal Anthropology. We want to redouble our efforts to achieve a better and more sustainable future for all by learning more about how anthropologists are using these methods to respond to global challenges of our times. We encourage presentations that explore emergent methodologies and interactive approaches. We offer an inclusive forum to explore creative and innovative approaches, discuss collaborative and participatory methods and tackle practical problems.
Possible areas of contemporary interest might be dialogues between emergent and existing forms of film making; AI and changing technologies (extended reality (XR); storytelling and narrative, indigenous filmmaking; animation, and aesthetics.
In addition to this open call, we are also looking to highlight the global challenges for visual and multimodal anthropology. We ask how visual and multimodal methods can help to address the global challenges of our times. We want to learn how anthropologists are using visual and multimodal tools to respond to issues such as inequality, environmental protection, poverty, climate change, war, and justice. We welcome engagement with topics such as food and hunger, water, migration, forced displacement, extremism and intolerance, social inequalities, mental health, disability, discrimination and genocide, peace and justice, climate change and sustainability, renewables and just economies.
This virtual conference sits alongside the RAI FILM Festival which is a biennial international event celebrating the best in documentary filmmaking from around the globe and established in 1985 by the Royal Anthropological Institute (UK). The festival showcases new work from academic anthropologists and related disciplines, and from filmmakers at all levels of experience from students to professionals. It looks for fearless films that ask difficult questions, build bridges, seek redress and promote social justice and dialogue.
To see our two most recent editions see: https://festival.raifilm.org.uk/
RAI FILM Festival 2025 will celebrate our 40th anniversary both in person and online: https://raifilm.org.uk/rai-film-festival-2025/
In person film festival – 27–30 March 2025 at Watershed & Arnolfini, Bristol UK
Screenings, gala events, workshops and talks
Festival films available online throughout April 2025
Streaming 80 films available 24/7 worldwide
RAI FILM Conference – 28 April‑2 May 2025
Keynotes, panels, roundtable, workshops and paper presentations
Join us to explore the critical role of visual and multimodal anthropology in addressing contemporary global issues. Submit your proposals and contribute to a dynamic and inclusive forum for innovative and creative scholarly exchange.
Panel Submission Guidelines:
1. Panel, Roundtable, and Workshop Proposals:
- Title: Concise and descriptive.
- Short Abstract: a (very) short abstract of less than 300 characters,
- Long Abstract: a long abstract of 250 words
2. Important Dates:
- Call for Panels Closes: 1 October 2024
- Call for Papers Opens: 1 November 2024
- Call for Papers Closes: 17 January 2025
- Registration Opens: 24 February 2025
To Submit: All proposals must be made via an online form https://nomadit.co.uk/conference/raiff2025/panel-form
Towards new alternatives in social care: Transitions in the domestic, institutional and community care scenarios
Panel
CfP for the 9th APA (Associação Portuguesa de Antropologia)
in-person panel P100 – Towards new alternatives in social care: Transitions in the domestic, institutional and community care scenarios
9th APA (Associação Portuguesa de Antropologia)
Castelo (Portugal)
14 to 18 July 2025
Abstracts are due by January 13, 2025
https://apa2025.eventqualia.net/pt/inicio/painéis/chamada-comunicações/
We invite submissions of papers in both Spanish and English that provide new insights on this topic.
Abstract:
Care practices have significant relations to people’s existence and social reproduction. Caregiving involves a complex interaction between stakeholders in various scenarios (domestic, institutional, and community-based). Indeed, care is provided through a changing constellation of resources across families, the State, the market and civil society, all of which comprise the institutional structure of social care. Similarly, care is structured not only by gender but also by age, class, and ethnic/national origin. The traditional care options have been between domestic care and residential facilities. Institutionalization in a residential care home is an option that is usually reserved for worsening situations of dependence. Ageing in one’s own home is an aspiration, but this often takes place in housing and neighborhoods that are not adapted to the needs of the ageing, accelerating their vulnerable processes. In addition, territorial disparities (urban-rural areas) also account for inequalities in the access of care.
Our panel is oriented towards identifying the elements that can give rise to alternative formulas for social care, which make it possible to shift the central role played by families and women, favoring the dignification of paid and unpaid care. To understand the experiences in new care environments that try to foster new forms of articulation between social agents and their care surroundings (cohousing, care ecosystems, communities, etc.). We are interested in contributions that, based on ethnographic work and theoretical reflection, analyze innovative formulas in the articulation of long-term care providers, identifying their scope and limitations when subverting territorial, social and gender inequalities.